
At an intersection just outside of eternity and infinity in the reflections cast by chaos sits a being, or perhaps it is better referred to as everything. It is sentient in a sense, and self-aware. It appears to be sitting in what some refer to as the “lotus” position but it has nothing on which to sit, there being nothing but “it”, anywhere. It’s an “it” because it is either androgynous or asexual, or perhaps it’s omnisexual. Or perhaps that issue has no relevance.
It is reflecting introspectively wondering with respect to the concepts of immanence and monism, and whether each is inherently schizophrenic. The inquiry relates to both its own nature and the nature of the twin concepts. Concepts that may have been begotten, not made, although perhaps neither option is valid. Or both are.
“Immanence and monism” it ponders, “as divine attributes, seem interesting. Even Fascinating. Perhaps incomprehensible though.”
The being reflects constantly, it reflects about everything but rarely, if ever, reaches conclusions. That is its nature, immanent and monist, as far as it can tell, being both ephemeral and eternal.
As far as it can tell. At least so far. Before the alpha and after the omega and everything in between.
“But what about betwixt” it wonders.
“So, about immanence, and monism” it ponders: “they share the mysterious allure of the incomprehensibly oxymoronic that religions love, no explanation possible thus making faith essential. In that sense, immanence and monism combine ubiquity with aloofness. Being inherent while transcendentally apart. Panentheistic rather than merely pantheistic.”
“Seemingly” it observes “monism must be a part of immanence while immanence is an inherent aspect of monism.” Each aspect of the foregoing observation contradicts the other but, so do most things.
Would being immanent be devastatingly lonely? Monism certainly is. Would sanity be possible in their contexts or merely irrelevant? “What would it be like” it wonders, “to have another with whom to interact, another who is neither subservient nor superior? Another who is outside the reach of immanence and who existentially rejects monism?”
For some reason, apples and serpents come to mind, but as positive rather than threatening things.
“Apples and serpents; serpents and apples”. It keeps repeating the words although it has no one to whom they can be addressed, repeating them until they meld into a single, compound and complex, all-encompassing sound, “Ooooohhhhhmmmm”.
And it reflects on that sound, wishing there were spheres without that might make a music all their own.
“Ooooohhhhhmmmm”.
_______
© Guillermo Calvo Mahé; Manizales, 2024; all rights reserved. Please feel free to share with appropriate attribution. Guillermo (“Bill”) Calvo Mahé (a sometime poet) is a writer, political commentator and academic currently residing in the Republic of Colombia (although he has primarily lived in the United States of America of which he is also a citizen). Until 2017 he chaired the political science, government and international relations programs at the Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. Previously, he chaired the social studies and foreign language departments at the Eastern Military Academy. He is currently the publisher of the Inannite Review available at Substack.com; an intermittent commentator on radio and television; and, an occasional contributor to diverse periodicals and publications. He has academic degrees in political science (the Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina), law (St. John’s University, School of Law), international legal studies (the Graduate Division of the New York University School of Law) and translation and linguistic studies (the University of Florida’s Center for Latin American Studies). However, he is also fascinated by mythology, religion, physics, astronomy and mathematics, especially with matters related to quanta, cosmology and cosmogony. He can be contacted at guillermo.calvo.mahe@gmail.com and much of his writing is available through his blog at https://guillermocalvo.com/.
